Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Guru Terbaik Berdasarkan Kinerja dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Penulis

  • Aulia Paramita Fakultas Teknik, Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Fanisya Alva Mustika Fakultas Teknik, Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Naely Farkhatin Fakultas Teknik, Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/TEKNOSI.v3i1.2017.9-18

Kata Kunci:

Analytical Hierarchy Process, Guru, Kinerja, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, Criterium Decision Plus

Abstrak

Abstract— Teacher is professional educator who have the duty, function, and important role in educating the nation. In order for the functions and duties inherent in the functional position of teacher conducted in accordance with the applicable rules, it is necessary to assess the performance of teacher who guarantee a quality learning process. Determine the performance of teacher can encourage an increase in the quality of education and increase motivation and professionalism of teacher in performing the tasks. The headmaster made 15 criteria to determine the best teacher, namely: attendance, discipline rules, responsibility and productivity, social interaction, motivation and self-development, innovative, responsive and initiative, flexibility in other tasks, communication, teamwork, honesty, friendly and polite, aesthetic dress, effective in using the gadget, cleanliness and tidiness class. To determine the performance of the teacher, then one decision that can be done using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). With the decision making is expected to choose an effective teacher performance. Determination of the teacher's performance is further processed by the criterium Decision Plus (CDP). The results of this study are the order of 4 of the best teachers at Yayasan Lentera Insan.

Referensi

Arikunto 2009] Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

[Fanny wasiat 2010] Fanny, Wasiat. Juni. 2010. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Seleksi Pelamar Kerja di PT. Gizindo Primanusantara. Jakarta.

[Mangkunegara 2005] Mangkunegara, A.A. Anwar Prabu. 2005. Evaluasi Kinerja. Bandung : Refika Aditama.

[Mathis 2006] Mathis, R.L. & J.H. Jackson. 2006. Human Resource Management: Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan Dian Angelia. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

[Nurlaila 2010] Nurlaila, 2010. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia I. Penerbit LepKhair.

[Rasyid 2007] Rasyid, Harun & Mansur. 2007. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: CV. Wacana Prima.

[Rivai 2005] Rivai, Vethzal & Basri. 2005. Peformance Appraisal: Sistem yang tepat untuk Menilai Kinerja Karyawan dan Meningkatkan Daya Saing Perusahan. Jakarta: PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

[Sudijono 2006] Sudijono, Anas. 2006. Pengantar Evalusi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

[Yasrin Zabidi 2007] Yasrin, Zabidi. 2007. Perancangan Sistem Penilaian Kinerja di STT Adisujtipto sebagai Pendukung Sistem Penjamin Mutu. Surabaya.

Peraturan Menteri Pemberdayaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 16 Tahun 2009 tentang Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya.

[Andi 2011] Andi. “Penerapan Metode AHPâ€. 2011. http://bangded.blogspot.com/2011 (diakses 10/07/2013)

[Hanif 2007] Hanif. “Sistem Pendukung Keputusanâ€. 2007. http://haniif.wordpress.com (diakses 08/07/2013)

[Silisworo 2009] Sulisworo. “Analisis Hirarki Prosesâ€. 2009. http://blog.uad.ac.id (diakses04/07/2013)

Unduhan

Telah diserahkan

31-10-2016

Diterima

19-11-2016

Diterbitkan

23-04-2017

Cara Mengutip

[1]
A. Paramita, F. A. Mustika, dan N. Farkhatin, “Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Guru Terbaik Berdasarkan Kinerja dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)”, TEKNOSI, vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 9–18, Apr 2017.

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles

Artikel Serupa

> >> 

Anda juga bisa Mulai pencarian similarity tingkat lanjut untuk artikel ini.