Public Opinion Sentiment Analysis Regarding Music Royalty Policy Using Naive Bayes Algorithm on Twitter Data

Authors

  • Nilna Sholihah Universitas Airlangga
  • Mas Rahmah Program Studi Magister Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/TEKNOSI.v12i2.2026.181-189

Keywords:

Sentiment Analysis, Naive Bayes, Orange Data Mining, Music Royalties, Twitter

Abstract

The music royalty policy in Indonesia, regulated by the Minister of Law Regulation Number 27 of 2025, has triggered various responses from the public. This study aims to analyze public opinion sentiment on Twitter regarding the music royalty policy using the Naive Bayes algorithm. Data was collected from Indonesian-language Twitter accounts from August 1-15, 2025, resulting in 1,588 tweets, which were then analyzed using Orange Data Mining. The analysis process included data crawling using Google Colab, data preprocessing, emotional analysis, and polarization analysis using multilingual sentiment. The results showed a distribution of sentiment: 584 positive tweets (36.8%), 561 neutral tweets (35.3%), and 443 negative tweets (27.9%). The Naive Bayes algorithm produced an accuracy of 97.17% with a prediction error rate of 45 tweets. The confusion matrix demonstrated excellent model performance in classifying public sentiment. This study provides important insights into public perceptions of the implementation of the music royalty policy and can be used as evaluation material for stakeholders in the Indonesian music industry.

References

Kementerian Hukum, “Peraturan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 tentang Pengelolaan Royalti Hak Cipta Lagu dan/atau Musik,” peraturan.bpk.go.id.

A. Setiawan, “Royalti Perkuat Industri Musik Nasional,” indonesia.go.id.

Henry, “Potensi Penghasilan Pencipta Lagu Indonesia dari Royalti Selama 2023 Capai Rp4 Triliun, Faktanya Jauh dari Harapan,” liputan6.com.

IWM, “Mempelajari Kewajiban Bayar Royalti untuk Bisnis Non-Musik,” Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual.

R. Sabina dan T. Ramli, “Analisis Pelindungan Hak Cipta di Era Streaming Musik Digital: Implementasi dan tantangan di Indonesia,” Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 11, no. 5, 2025.

N. Yusuf, “Complete Guide to Music Copyright Laws in Indonesia,” Am Badar & Am Badar.

R. Wiratama dan B. Baidhowi, “Tanggung Jawab Hukum Aggregator dalam Distribusi Musik tanpa Pendaftaran Hak Cipta di Indonesia,” Nomos: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum, vol. 5, no. 4, 2025.

A. Ikhlasanti, “Siaran Pers: Riset Hak Cipta Musik Digital: Kebijakan Belum Memihak Seniman,” Koalisi Seni.

D. Tullah, H. Khalid, dan S. Poernomo, “Perlindungan Hak Cipta Dalam Industri Musik Digital di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata,” Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), vol. 5, no. 2, 2024.

C. M. Annur, “Jumlah Pengguna Twitter Indonesia Duduki Peringkat ke-4 Dunia per Juli 2023,” databoks.co.id.

S. Kemp, “Digital 2025: Indonesia,” datareportal.com.

P. Aryantini, G. Pramana, T. Erviantono, dan E. Duarte, “Peran Media Sosial Dalam Pembentukan Opini Publik Politik: Studi Kasus Kampanye Pemilu 2024,” Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, vol. 5, no. 5, 2024.

A. Saputra, D. Kurniasih, dan D. Indranika, “Dinamika Kebijakan Publik di Indonesia dalam Menghadapi Isu Viral: Antara Respons dan Tantangan Implementasi,” Jurnal Administrasi Publik, vol. 16, no. 1, 2025.

K. Latifah dan F. Najicha, “Implikasi Media Sosial Terhadap Formulasi Kebijakan Publik,” Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, vol. 6, no. 1, 2023.

V. A. Fitri, R. Andreswari, dan M. A. Hasibuan, “Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Twitter with Case of Anti-LGBT Campaign in Indonesia using Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, and Random Forest Algorithm,” Procedia Comput Sci, vol. 161, pp. 765–772, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.181.

Riyantoro dan Fauziah, “Sentiment Analysis of Twitter Data on Indonesia’s Cabinet Using Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine Algorithms,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi dan Rekayasa, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 108–118, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.35760/tr.2025.v30i2.13953.

F. J. Damanik dan D. B. Setyohadi, “Analysis of Public Sentiment About Covid-19 in Indonesia on Twitter Using Multinomial Naive Bayes and Support Vector Machine,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 704, no. 1, p. 012027, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/704/1/012027.

A. D. Syafutra dan K. Kusrini, “Analisis Sentimen Omnibus Law di Twitter dengan Machine Learning dan Teknik Resampling,” Jambura Journal of Informatics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 22–35, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.37905/jji.v1i1.30935.

P. A. Setiawati, I. M. A. D. Suarjaya, dan I. N. P. Trisna, “Sentiment Analysis of Unemployment in Indonesia During and Post COVID-19 on X (Twitter) Using Naïve Bayes and Support Vector Machine,” Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 662–675, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v6i2.713.

J. W. Creswell dan J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, 2018.

B. Liu, “Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining,” Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–167, May 2012, doi: 10.2200/S00416ED1V01Y201204HLT016.

B. Zhao, “Web Scraping,” in Encyclopedia of Big Data, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32001-4_483-1.

T. Carneiro, R. V. Medeiros Da Nobrega, T. Nepomuceno, G.-B. Bian, V. H. C. De Albuquerque, dan P. P. R. Filho, “Performance Analysis of Google Colaboratory as a Tool for Accelerating Deep Learning Applications,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 61677–61685, 2018, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874767.

J. Demsar et al., “Orange: Data mining toolbox in Python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 14, no. 1, 2013.

S. Vijayanari, J. Ilamathi, dan Nithya, “Preprocessing Techniques for Text Mining-An Overview,” International Journal of Computer Science & Communication Networks, vol. 5, no. 1, 2015.

A. Jivani, “A Comparative Study of Stemming Algorithms,” International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, vol. 2, no. 6, 2011.

J. J. Webster dan C. Kit, “Tokenization as the Initial Phase in NLP,” in Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics, Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992, p. 1106. doi: 10.3115/992424.992434.

M. Adriani, J. Asian, B. Nazief, S. M. M. Tahaghoghi, dan H. E. Williams, “Stemming Indonesian,” ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1–33, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1145/1316457.1316459.

T. Y. Pahtoni dan H. Jati, “Analisis Sentimen Data Twitter Terkait CHATGPT Menggunakan Orange Data Mining,” Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 329–336, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.20241127276.

P. Ekman dan D. Cordaro, “What is Meant by Calling Emotions Basic,” Emotion Review, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 364–370, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1177/1754073911410740.

B. Pang dan L. Lee, “Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis,” Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, vol. 2, no. 1–2, pp. 1–135, 2008, doi: 10.1561/1500000011.

J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, dan K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 2019.

S. Cahyawijaya et al., “IndoNLG: Benchmark and Resources for Evaluating Indonesian Natural Language Generation,” in Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2021.

C. D. Manning, P. Raghavan, dan H. Schütze, Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511809071.

I. Rish, “An Empirical Study of the Naive Bayes Classifier,” IJCAI 2001 Workshop on Empirical Methods in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 3, no. 22, 2001.

D. Powers, “Evaluation: From Precision, Recall and F-Factor to ROC, Informedness, Markedness & Correlation,” Journal of Machine Learning Technologies, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.

M. Sokolova dan G. Lapalme, “A Systematic Analysis of Performance Measures for Classification Tasks,” Inf Process Manag, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 427–437, Jul. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002.

“Pelantikan LMKN: Royalti Aman, Kreator Nyaman,” Kanwil Kemenkum Yogyakarta.

N. Rosa, “Pakar UGM: Kebijakan Royalti Musik Kurang Tepat, Ekonomi Sedang Tidak Stabil,” detik.com.

D. Rahmawati, “Risiko Polarisasi Algoritma Media Sosial: Kajian Terhadap Kerentanan Sosial dan Ketahanan Bangsa, Media Sosial dan Dampaknya bagi Sosial Budaya Masyarakat Indonesia,” Jurnal Kajian Lemhanas RI, vol. 33, 2018.

F. B. Annas, H. N. Petranto, dan A. A. Pramayoga, “Opini publik dalam polarisasi politik di media sosial,” Jurnal PIKOM (Penelitian Komunikasi dan Pembangunan), vol. 20, no. 2, p. 111, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.31346/jpikom.v20i2.2006.

L. Damayanti dan K. M. Lhaksmana, “Sentiment Analysis of the 2024 Indonesia Presidential Election on Twitter,” Sinkron, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 938–946, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13379.

A. R. Sembiring dan C. K. Dewa, “Sentiment Analysis On Indonesian Tweets about the 2024 Election,” Sinkron, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 413–422, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.14481.

C.-H. Lin dan U. Nuha, “Sentiment Analysis of Indonesian Datasets Based on a Hybrid Deep-Learning Strategy,” J Big Data, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 88, May 2023, doi: 10.1186/s40537-023-00782-9.

Tamara Rosyida, H. P. Putro, dan Herry Wahyono, “Analisis Sentimen Terhadap Pilpres 2024 Berdasarkan Opini dari Twitter Menggunakan Naïve Bayes dan SVM,” TEKNOKRIS, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 23–32, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.61488/teknokris.v26i1.245.

M. G. Purboyo, J. Junaidi, dan A. Amriwan, “Eskalasi Partisanship Politik dalam Pembentukan Polarisasi pada Masyarakat Digital,” SOSIOLOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Ilmu Sosial dan Budaya, vol. 26, no. 01, pp. 27–45, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.23960/sosiologi.v26i01.1220.

Submitted

2025-11-14

Accepted

2025-12-18

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

[1]
N. Sholihah and M. Rahmah, “Public Opinion Sentiment Analysis Regarding Music Royalty Policy Using Naive Bayes Algorithm on Twitter Data”, TEKNOSI, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 181–189, Aug. 2026.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.